Strategic IT · Cyber Defense · Infrastructure Management
We think like a CIO.
We govern like a CISO.
We build like a
SECURITY TEAM.
Most providers wait for tickets. We govern your environment against NIST CSF 2.0 and CIS Controls v8, report on it in terms your board understands, and hold the standard as you grow.
Fig. 01 — the scorecard every client receives. Rows are NIST CSF 2.0 functions, columns are control areas.
Approach
Every provider in this market resells the same platforms. What separates them is whether anyone is governing the environment, defining the process, and measuring the result — or just answering the phone.
Success measured by
Tickets closed and uptime
Controls verified against a published framework
Security
A product line you can add on
The design constraint on every decision
Configuration
Whatever each environment accumulated
One documented baseline, enforced and drift-checked
Reporting
Ticket volume and response times
Posture, drift, remediation rate, and open risk by severity
Who you deal with
A queue
A named principal accountable for the outcome
When we disagree
Does what it’s told
Tells you what the risk is, in writing, and asks you to decide
The baseline
Every environment we manage is measured against the same published standards. Our recommendations aren’t preferences you have to take on trust, and your auditor, your insurer, and your board all read the same map we do.
NIST CSF 2.0
The reporting structure. Six functions give leadership one view of posture that needs no technical translation — and it’s the language your insurer and your clients’ auditors already use.
Govern
Identify
Protect
Detect
Respond
Recover
CIS Controls v8
The build standard. Prescriptive, ordered by real-world attack data, and grouped into implementation tiers so we can be honest about where you are today and what the next tier costs.
IG1 — Essential
IG2 — Risk-based
IG3 — Advanced
What we manage
Eight domains, one accountable owner.
Each domain runs on a platform we’re a partner on, configured to the same baseline every time. No bespoke builds nobody can support later.
COVERAGE
24/7 monitored detection and response, delivered with eSentire.
MAPPING
Every control traced to a NIST CSF 2.0 function and a CIS v8 safeguard.
001 · Microsoft
Identity & access
Entra ID hardening, conditional access, privileged access control, break-glass procedure. Where modern attacks land, so where we start.
002 · Microsoft · eSentire
Endpoint & detection
Defender deployment plus 24/7 managed detection and response. Tamper protection, application control, analysts on escalation.
003 · Microsoft · Proofpoint
Email & collaboration
Phishing and impersonation defence, DMARC enforcement, link and attachment protection. Email is still the front door.
004 · Fortinet · Cisco
Network & perimeter
Firewall policy, segmentation, secure remote access, wireless. Designed to a documented standard, not accumulated over years.
005 · Tenable
Vulnerability management
Continuous scanning, risk-ranked remediation, and a patch cadence you can show an insurer. Findings that close, not accumulate.
006 · Datto
Backup & continuity
Immutable backup, restores tested on a schedule, documented recovery targets, ransomware recovery runbooks.
007 · NIST CSF · CIS
Governance & compliance
Policy set, risk register, SOC 2 and HIPAA readiness, FTC Safeguards, cyber insurance questionnaires answered accurately.
008 · Dell · Lenovo
IT leadership & lifecycle
Roadmap and budget ownership, vendor management, hardware standards, refresh planning, quarterly business reviews.
Who we work with
Mid-market companies, wherever they operate.
Roughly twenty to five hundred users. Regulated, insured, or contractually accountable for someone else’s data — companies where a breach or an outage stops revenue the same day. We’re based in Houston and currently support clients in Texas, Florida, and New York.
Every platform we manage is cloud-administered, so location doesn’t change what we can do. Where hands are needed on site, we coordinate vetted local technicians against our documented standard.
01 — Energy
Upstream, midstream, and oilfield services. Corporate IT for companies whose downtime is measured in barrels — Gulf Coast and beyond.
02 — Healthcare
Clinics and specialty practices. HIPAA posture, EHR uptime, and audit evidence that holds up under review.
03 — Professional services
Legal, accounting, engineering. Client confidentiality obligations and insurer requirements you have to prove.
04 — Auto retail
Dealer groups. FTC Safeguards compliance, DMS integration, one standard across every rooftop.
How it works
The same five steps, every environment.
01
02
03
04
05
Reporting
What you actually receive.
A finding register in plain English, each item traced to a framework reference, ranked by exploitability, with an owner and a close date. This is the deliverable, not a summary of it.
| Ref | Finding | Severity | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| F-014 | Directory permissions allow a non-tiered group to escalate to domain administrator. | Critical | CSF PR.AA-05 CIS 5.4 |
| F-021 | Legacy authentication path remains enabled for a subset of mailboxes, bypassing conditional access. | High | CSF PR.AA-03 CIS 6.4 |
| F-033 | Third-party application holds standing administrative consent beyond its functional requirement. | High | CSF PR.AA-05 CIS 6.8 |
| F-047 | Backup restore has not been tested within the defined recovery objective window. | Moderate | CSF RC.RP-01 CIS 11.5 |
| F-052 | Domain-based message authentication is not enforced for a third-party sending service. | Resolved | CSF PR.DS-02 CIS 9.2 |
Fig. 02 — illustrative finding register. Every item carries a framework reference and target date; no client data.
Fit
We’re not for everyone.
This model works when leadership treats technology as a business risk to be managed. When it doesn’t, we’d both rather find out in the first conversation than three months in.
✓
A good fit
—
Leadership wants to understand risk, not just approve invoices
—
You need a documented standard you can show an auditor, an insurer, or a client
—
You’ll fund remediation once a finding is ranked and explained
—
You want one accountable advisor, not five vendors pointing at each other
—
Growth is coming and you’d rather build the foundation before it arrives
×
Not a fit
—
The deciding factor is the lowest per-seat price
—
You want the computer guy — fix it, don’t ask questions, don’t send reports
—
Critical findings get acknowledged and then deferred indefinitely
—
Systems past end of support are staying regardless of the risk
—
Security is something you’ll address after the audit fails
Start here
Microsoft 365 posture review.
Twelve control areas measured against our baseline, mapped to NIST CSF 2.0 and CIS v8. Written findings and a prioritised fix list in five business days. No cost, nothing installed, no obligation.
You’ll get the same report format shown above, and a call to walk through it. If we’re not a fit, you keep the findings.
Jonimis Services LLC
Houston, Texas · Clients nationwide
sales@sitesystem.net